Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Immunization reverses memory deficits without reducing brain Abeta burden in Alzheimer's disease model

Bibliographic

Year of Publication:
2002
Contact PI Name:
Steven M. Paul
Contact PI Affiliation:
Neuroscience Discovery Research, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Co-Authors:
Jean-Cosme Dodart, Kelly R. Bales, Kimberley S. Gannon, Stephen J. Greene, Ronald B. DeMattos, Chantal Mathis, Cynthia A. DeLong, Su Wu, Xin Wu, David M. Holtzman
Primary Reference (PubMED ID):
Funding Source:
Not Reported
Study Goal and Principal Findings:

This study investigated effects of passive immunization on brain Aβ levels and cognitive deficits in old PDAPP Tg mice. Previous studies have shown that chronic treatment with the monoclonal antibody m266, specific for Aβ, increases plasma concentrations of Aβ and reduces Aβ burden in young PDAPP Tg mice. This study reports that administration of m266 to 24 month old PDAPP mice can rapidly reverse memory deficits in both an object recognition task and a holeboard learning and memory task, but without altering brain Aβ burden. Results also found that an Aβ/antibody complex was present in both the plasma and the cerebrospinal fluid of m266- treated mice. This data indicates that passive immunization with this anti-Aβ monoclonal antibody can very rapidly reverse memory impairment in certain learning and memory tasks in the PDAPP mouse model of AD, owing perhaps to enhanced peripheral clearance and (or) sequestration of a soluble brain Aβ species.

Therapeutic Agent

Therapeutic Information:
Therapy Type:
Biologic - Immunotherapy(passive)
Therapeutic Agent:
m266 (anti-Abeta Mab)
Therapeutic Target:
beta Amyloid Peptide

Animal Model

Model Information:
Species:
Mouse
Model Type:
APP
Strain/Genetic Background:
Not Reported
Animal Model Notes:
Characterization of the PDAPP mouse model can be found here: Johnson-Wood, K., Lee, M., Motter, R., Hu, K., Gordon, G., Barbour, R., Khan, K., Gordon, M., Tan, H., Games, D., et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1550–1555.

Experimental Design

Is the following information reported in the study?:
Power/Sample Size Calculation
Randomized into Groups
Blinded for Treatment
Blinded for Outcome Measures
Pharmacokinetic Measures
Pharmacodynamic Measures
Toxicology Measures
ADME Measures
Biomarkers
Dose
Formulation
Route of Delivery
Duration of Treatment
Frequency of Administration
Age of Animal at the Beginning of Treatment
Age of Animal at the End of Treatment
Sex as a Biological Variable
Study Balanced for Sex as a Biological Variable
Number of Premature Deaths
Number of Excluded Animals
Statistical Plan
Genetic Background
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Included
Conflict of Interest
Experiment Notes

Object recognition task was the sole outcome measure blinded to treatment.

Outcomes

Outcome Measured
Outcome Parameters
Behavioral
Novel Object Recognition Test (NORT)
Hole-Board Memory Task
Histopathology
beta Amyloid Load
Biochemical
Plasma-beta Amyloid Peptide 40
Plasma-beta Amyloid Peptide 42
Brain-beta Amyloid Peptide 40
Brain-beta Amyloid Peptide 42
Biomarker
Plasma-beta Amyloid Peptide 40
Plasma-beta Amyloid Peptide 42
Pharmacodynamics
Target Engagement (Complex of Antibody with beta Amyloid-CSF/Plasma)