Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

A plaque-specific antibody clears existing β-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease mice

Bibliographic

Year of Publication:
2012
Contact PI Name:
Ronald B. DeMattos
Contact PI Affiliation:
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
Co-Authors:
Jirong Lu, Ying Tang, Margaret M. Racke, Cindy A. DeLong, John A. Tzaferis, Justin T. Hole, Beth M. Forster, Peter C. McDonnell, Feng Liu, Robert D. Kinley, William H. Jordan, Michael L. Hutton
Primary Reference (PubMED ID):
Funding Source:
Not Reported
Study Goal and Principal Findings:

This study tests the hypothesis that antibody specificity for deposited beta amyloid plaque is critical for plaque removal since soluble Abeta peptide would block recognition of deposited forms. In order to test this hypothesis, the authors developed and engineered high affinity murine monoclonal antibodies that selectively target deposited plaque in an AD brain. Mouse Mabs were generated that were specific for Abetap3-x with either minimal (mE8-IgG1) or maximal (mE8-IgG2a) effector function. These antibodies robustly labeled deposited plaque in both AD and PDAPP brain sections and led to a significant reduction of deposited Abeta  in an ex vivo phagocytosis assay. Therapeutic plaque-lowering studies performed with the anti-Abp3-42 antibodies in extremely aged PDAPP mice (23 to 26 months of age) demonstrated that mE8 on either maximal or minimal effector function significantly lowered deposited Abeta, whereas mice treated with the N-terminal antibody 3D6 (mIgG2b), which binds both soluble and insoluble Abeta, lacked efficacy. The underlying mechanism of action responsible for these contrasting results was identified as a differential target engagement for the antibodies; the Abp3-42 antibodies crossed the blood-brain barrier and bound to the deposited Abeta, whereas the 3D6 antibody lacked plaque binding, a finding thought to be due to its saturation with soluble Abeta in the brain. Importantly, micro hemorrhage analyses demonstrated that the Abp3-42 antibodies did not increase this adverse event, whereas mice treated with 3D6 had extensive micro bleeds. These studies have profound implications for the development of therapeutic Abeta antibodies for Alzheimer’s disease.

Therapeutic Agent

Therapeutic Information:
Therapy Type:
Biologic - Immunotherapy(passive)
Therapeutic Agent:
mE8-IgG1 (anti-Abeta Plaque Mab)
Therapeutic Target:
beta Amyloid Fibril
Therapy Type:
Biologic - Immunotherapy(passive)
Therapeutic Agent:
mE8-IgG2a (anti-Abeta Plaque Mab)
Therapeutic Target:
beta Amyloid Fibril
Therapy Type:
Biologic - Immunotherapy(passive)
Therapeutic Agent:
3D6 (anti-Abeta Mab)
Therapeutic Target:
beta Amyloid Peptide

Animal Model

Model Information:
Species:
Mouse
Model Type:
APP
Strain/Genetic Background:
 C57B6 x DBA2

Experimental Design

Is the following information reported in the study?:
Power/Sample Size Calculation
Randomized into Groups
Blinded for Treatment
Blinded for Outcome Measures
Pharmacokinetic Measures
Pharmacodynamic Measures
Toxicology Measures
ADME Measures
Biomarkers
Dose
Formulation
Route of Delivery
Duration of Treatment
Frequency of Administration
Age of Animal at the Beginning of Treatment
Age of Animal at the End of Treatment
Sex as a Biological Variable
Study Balanced for Sex as a Biological Variable
Number of Premature Deaths
Number of Excluded Animals
Statistical Plan
Genetic Background
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria Included
Conflict of Interest

Outcomes

Outcome Measured
Outcome Parameters
Histopathology
beta Amyloid Load
Activated Microglia
Biochemical
Brain-beta Amyloid Peptide 40
Brain-beta Amyloid Peptide 42
Pharmacokinetics
Antibody Concentration-Plasma
Antibody Concentration-CSF
Pharmacodynamics
Target Engagement (Binding beta Amyloid Antibodies to beta Amyloid Deposits)
Toxicology
Microhemorrhage